View RSS Feed

The Nillabyte Perspective: Entertainment

Breaking Bad: Rooting For The Antihero

** Spoiler Alert: This article may contain spoilers for the AMC series Breaking Bad, from its first season to its third season.

What would you do to guarantee the financial security of your family? Most of us would probably work, spend wisely, save, and possibly invest. However, what would you do if you had only short time to live due to cancer? Would you be willing to participate in illegal activities to gain a substantial amount of money? Would you manufacture meth, steal, and murder, all for your peace of mind that your family will be financially stable when you die? That is the story and some of the ethical questions raised in Breaking Bad, AMC's award winning series about a high-school chemistry teacher who is diagnosed with lung cancer.

Walter White (Bryan Cranston), after being diagnosed with lung cancer, begins to question what will happen to his family once he dies. After having an innocent conversation with his brother-in-law who is a DEA agent, Walt concludes that there is much money to be made from cooking meth. Walt enlists the help of Jesse Pinkman (Aaron Paul), a former student and current drug dealer, and together haphazardly cook and deal crystal meth. Walt must hide this from everyone he loves: his wife, his son who has cerebral palsy, his brother-in-law who is a DEA agent, his friends, and his co-workers. To ensure the success of his illegal business, Walt must steal meth cooking ingredients and hardware, murder other drug dealers, participate in drug cartel turf wars, and repeatedly lie to his family and friends.

The main theme and the main question posed by the show strikes an interesting debate. What would you be willing to do, how far would you go, for the sake of your family's economic survival? I would imagine, as depicted in the show, that doing such illegal acts would not always turn out roses. I would not want to risk lies being exposed and trust lost. I could not violate my principles and take those steps into unethical waters. Such debate is intriguing, but why is it that after I concluded I would not do what Walt chooses to do, I still watch the show and hope that Walt will succeed in the illegal drug business? What does it say about me, and the audience, when we root for an antihero?

An antihero isn't necessarily a villain, but is a protagonist who lacks the attributes of a hero. When Walter White was diagnosed with lung cancer, knowing he had no significant savings and that his chemotherapy would come with an exorbitant cost, he began to do questionable things, making his character an antihero. Instead of asking for financial help from charitable organizations, instead of accepting an offer from a rich friend to pay for his chemotherapy, Walt lets his pride win over his humility and begins to swim in dark waters.

At first, I felt sympathy for the character Walt, but with each new episode, I became less sympathetic and began to relate to the character less. For example, I could not have the stomach to dissolve a rival's dead body in acid and then flush the remains down the toilet one bucket at a time. I would loathe myself for having to continuously lie to my wife and children, and create new lies to cover prior lies. I could not participate in ruining the lives of the people that would consume the meth I cooked. Even so, I still found myself hoping that Walt would make millions, win the turf wars, and that his wife, son, and his DEA agent brother-in-law would never find out.

At the end of season two, after Walt's cancer went into remission, and after he had made his stash, things began to unravel. After lies were exposed, his wife left him, bringing their son and newborn daughter with her. Hank, the DEA agent and Walt's brother-in-law, was on the evidence trail that would lead back to Walt. Jesse, Walt's partner, was more wrapped up in consuming meth rather than cooking and selling.

At this point, I asked myself, why am I rooting for this scumbag? Walt had betrayed his family. He had put his wife and his children at risk because he was too prideful to accept charity from his friends. Without knowing that his dad was making large sums of money from cooking meth, Walt Jr. established a small online charity (, and Walt Sr. began to launder his drug money through his son's honest and heart-felt website. Walt inadvertently pulled his brother-in-law Hank into the middle of a turf war that, midway this season, resulted in Hank being hospitalized for severe gun shot wounds. At the end of last season, season two, I realized that I should not be hoping for the success of Walt. I didn't admire the character, nor would I want to ever become like him. I began to cheer for his wife and her decision to leave Walt. I became excited when Hank got closer and closer to busting Walt and Jesse.

When I told some friends, who also watch the show, that I hope that Walt gets caught and fairly sentenced, they were perplexed. "Why would you want the good guy to get punished?" I argued that although Walt fulfilled his goal by making oodles of money for his family, the methods used to get that money were not indicative of a good guy. My friends didn't see it that way. Perhaps I'm looking at things in ways that are too black and white, but why do audiences cheer for antiheroes, like those found in The Sopranos, Prison Break, Dexter, Mad Men, and Breaking Bad? The only one of those series that I have stuck to watching is the latter, but I am close to ditching it. I find myself wanting less antihero series and more series about clear cut good vs. obvious evil. What do you think?


  1. Kyle Buckley's Avatar
    I find myself diametrically opposed to myself regarding Breaking BAd. It is a very entertaining show, but I have a hard time watching Walter White continue to put his family members in harm's way. And even after his cancer went into remission, he continued to cook meth. Wasn't the whole point of him cooking to get his family some money before he died? Now that death from cancer isn't as close to him as before, why should he still be cooking. In fact, his life, and the lives of his family members, are at more risk with him cooking, due to rival drug manufacturers and turf wars.

    I first started watching the show because the character Jesse is played by Aaron Paul, who i went to high school with. I wanted to see how good of an actor he is. He does a really good job in his role and definitely deserves another Emmy nod this season.
  2. macelly's Avatar
    Dissolving a body in acid and flushing the left overs down the crapper? Gross. I probably would have stopped watching after that.
  3. Danny Greer's Avatar
    Quote From macelly
    Dissolving a body in acid and flushing the left overs down the crapper? Gross. I probably would have stopped watching after that.
    Yeah, that was really nasty.
  4. Sarah's Avatar
    I really hate how shows like breaking bad glorify drug dealers. Why would anyone cheer for a drug maker unless the person cheering was already unethical?
  5. Jonah's Avatar
    I think that Walt could be considered a hero. Everything he does is for his family, he does nothing selfishly.
  6. Danny Greer's Avatar
    Quote From Jonah
    I think that Walt could be considered a hero. Everything he does is for his family, he does nothing selfishly.
    I disagree. At first, he was a criminal in order to ensure his family would have money after he died, but after his cancer went into remission, not only did he keep cooking, but he also expanded his business. In so doing, he continued to put his family's safety at risk even though he didn't need anymore money. The only reason he is still cooking is to get richer and because he loves doing it. That doesn't seem unselfish to me.
  7. Little Wiggy's Avatar
    I think Bryan Cranston and Aaron Paul do fantastic acting jobs in Breaking Bad. I'll be surprised if they don't both win Emmy awards.
  8. Patriotic's Avatar
    I think the best thing about Breaking Bad is the fact that the main character is such a complex mix of good and bad. Although it's easier to feel good about a traditional good-guy hero, I think the moral ambiguity the show explores is actually more similar to the complexity of real life, which is made up of more grey shades than black or white. How many of us are all good or all bad?


In order to post a comment, you must be registered and logged in.
Registration is free.
You can register by clicking here

About is a website dedicated to news, opinion, and discussion.

    Our political articles and commentary leans libertarian/conservative, but we will call out any politician who lies or treads on The Constitution. Truth matters, emotions don't.

    Our technology articles and commentary are about any technology news and stories that we feel passionate about.

    Our entertainment pieces are posted less frequently since we don't waste our time by consuming most of the trash that the media spews out, but we do enjoy some media. If you wish to contribute entertainment articles, or any other articles, please contact us.

Follow us

Follow on Facebook Follow onTwitter

Contact and Info

External Links